What was the Mich.-prospect's particular reason for doing this?Asking because there's a story about how a Michigan committ burn his TOSU letter.
It's that "fooled"-part that we all agree on--and that you have taken a bit more in stride than some of us (myself included), E-. As noted, I am "moving on", in my own way. Still, while I'll always give credit for the things that were accomplished during the relatively short period that we might call his "glory days" (and Tebow's--the more time passes, the more I appreciate TT's role in taking our program to new heights), the main reason it is right and proper (not to mention easier and easier) to look ahead with confidence and excitement, rather than back with bitterness, is because we are clearly better off "in the long run"--and the way we're picking up speed to get there.No. I knew he was temporary, although I was fooled into thinking he would stay just a few more years.
...I think that was a "Yes", but (again) a pretty damn cautious one...alright, alright, I'll let it go: that's gonna have to do, I guess. However, I have to say again that I'd rather see him "in action" making actual team-changing moves that send a message, set the tone for the whole program (LIKE the Janoris Jenkins dismissal, for eg.), rather than chewing his guys out publicly on the field for anything but their own really obvious public and selfishly stupid in-game behavior...Myself, I kind of like it when he voices everyone's frustration and anger with the refs , defending his team out there--personally, in fact, there've already been a couple of instances when I loved it!Ron Zook established that a coach gets 4 years, no matter what, so I can probably reserve judgement until 2014, with 2012 being a turning point for better or worse.
I want Muschamp to focus less on chewing out refs and more time chewing out players. I want one of his teams to beat a team they should not have defeated. After that, I may take a leap of faith.
...I think that was a "Yes", but (again) a pretty damn cautious one...alright, alright, I'll let it go: that's gonna have to do, I guess. However, I have to say again that I'd rather see him "in action" making actual team-changing moves that send a message, set the tone for the whole program (LIKE the Janoris Jenkins dismissal, for eg.), rather than chewing his guys out publicly on the field for anything but their own really obvious public and selfishly stupid in-game behavior...Myself, I kind of like it when he voices everyone's frustration and anger with the refs , defending his team out there--personally, in fact, there've already been a couple of instances when I loved it!
(laughing) OK, OK, I'm with you on some of this...I'm not like, related to Muschamp or anything...Yeah, I'd forgot about that freak-out/lost time out affair, not COMPLETELY his fault, btw, but I'll bet he learned a lesson there he probably should have learned a long time ago ("Don't let the LAST play burn you on the NEXT one!", or something like that). When you're in charge, there's no one to restrain you ultimately but yourself (though I HAVE seen top Head Coaches being pulled back by Assistant Coaches over the years; still, no excuses).What game was where Rainey muffed a punt because it hit another player first? Muschamp went ape$hit, but burned a timeout we could have used. That sticks out in my head. Yeah, defend your player, but don't make an @$$ of yourself and lose a timeout.
Also, no keynote victories. Even the Zooker beat ranked teams with, albeit with better talent and experience. Hall's sanction depleted teams beat ranked opponents.
I believe in Muschamp, but I need SOMETHING to base my faith on.