The title pretty well speaks for itself, but here is "where I'm coming from" and my OWN resulting "Biggest Concern":
I just finished watching my second time thru' the LSU/S. Carolina game, meaning I have now watched each of OUR last two games twice, and each of the last two games of South Carolina and LSU twice.
I'm NOT going to break down all the things that I noted, discovered and was able to conclude that led me to what I am about to say--only that I have strong grounds for saying it, and I ask y'all to bare that in mind in considering the assumptions I make along the way.
South Carolina is especially vulnerable to a steady, hit-'em'-up-the-gut then misdirection-to-either-edge running game, we HAVE such a running game and it's helped to wear opponents down to eventually dominate and beat them in the 4th quarter. It will be ENORMOUSLY tempting to enter this game determined to go that route on offense, "win or lose" relying on our strength. Similarly, the assumption would be that on defense THEY will try to run on US. Taken together, we're thus looking for a pound-it-out, relatively low-scoring game, one where we believe we can make the necessary halftime adjustments and outlast ANYONE to win it in the 4th quarter.
Here is my concern: I don't think that's what Spurrier has in mind, at least early, not in our "Swamp". I think he's planning to try to hit us with a fast-break passing offense in the first quarter, take advantage of what he expects to be another one of our sluggishly slow-starts to get up on us at least a couple of scores in this manner, AND take the crazed crowd out of it, at least for the time being, by taking an early big lead if he can. On defense, they'll be geared to stopping our running game, practically AT ALL COSTS--they'll have one, even TWO extra "men in the box", if necessary selling OUT in order to prevent what happened against LSU from happening to them again. No one has seen a passing attack from us yet, and the assumption MUST be that we don't HAVE one--we certainly don't have much of anything "game-tested".
They will dare us to pass, that much will NOT be a surprise--but again, the temptation will be to game-plan from our known, well-practiced and proven strength, the power running game, into their presumed weakness, AGAINST the run, regardless. We cannot concede this. There are too many ways in which this can end up getting us out-maneuvered, leaving us short late on the scoreboard and by then having to try to do things desperately through-the-air that would not be nearly so difficult earlier as part of our OWN little "surprise", and will have the added benefit of breaking their "press" relatively early in the game--when our OWN unexpected short-to-mid-range passing attack will have a MUCH better opportunity to turn-the-TABLES on "the Evil Genius", after all.
I am completely convinced that this is actually the SAFEST way to go here: we will benefit offensively from somehow "breaking the press" against the run ANYWAY, and if I'm wrong about their offensive game-plan we adjust without too much penalty at halftime of a close game. If I'm right, we avert disaster, either ready for them and able to limit the damage, and/or find ourselves in a bit of a back-and-forth track-meet that we're more ready to compete in than we would have been if we assumed too much and found ourselves overwhelmed and knocked back on our heels from the start.
(Agree? Disagree? Some other "concern" entirely? Let's get it into it NOW, I figure--by Thursday night I'll be in gut-check, "I don't wanna THINK about it"/"Let's just GET to it"-mode...)
I just finished watching my second time thru' the LSU/S. Carolina game, meaning I have now watched each of OUR last two games twice, and each of the last two games of South Carolina and LSU twice.
I'm NOT going to break down all the things that I noted, discovered and was able to conclude that led me to what I am about to say--only that I have strong grounds for saying it, and I ask y'all to bare that in mind in considering the assumptions I make along the way.
South Carolina is especially vulnerable to a steady, hit-'em'-up-the-gut then misdirection-to-either-edge running game, we HAVE such a running game and it's helped to wear opponents down to eventually dominate and beat them in the 4th quarter. It will be ENORMOUSLY tempting to enter this game determined to go that route on offense, "win or lose" relying on our strength. Similarly, the assumption would be that on defense THEY will try to run on US. Taken together, we're thus looking for a pound-it-out, relatively low-scoring game, one where we believe we can make the necessary halftime adjustments and outlast ANYONE to win it in the 4th quarter.
Here is my concern: I don't think that's what Spurrier has in mind, at least early, not in our "Swamp". I think he's planning to try to hit us with a fast-break passing offense in the first quarter, take advantage of what he expects to be another one of our sluggishly slow-starts to get up on us at least a couple of scores in this manner, AND take the crazed crowd out of it, at least for the time being, by taking an early big lead if he can. On defense, they'll be geared to stopping our running game, practically AT ALL COSTS--they'll have one, even TWO extra "men in the box", if necessary selling OUT in order to prevent what happened against LSU from happening to them again. No one has seen a passing attack from us yet, and the assumption MUST be that we don't HAVE one--we certainly don't have much of anything "game-tested".
They will dare us to pass, that much will NOT be a surprise--but again, the temptation will be to game-plan from our known, well-practiced and proven strength, the power running game, into their presumed weakness, AGAINST the run, regardless. We cannot concede this. There are too many ways in which this can end up getting us out-maneuvered, leaving us short late on the scoreboard and by then having to try to do things desperately through-the-air that would not be nearly so difficult earlier as part of our OWN little "surprise", and will have the added benefit of breaking their "press" relatively early in the game--when our OWN unexpected short-to-mid-range passing attack will have a MUCH better opportunity to turn-the-TABLES on "the Evil Genius", after all.
I am completely convinced that this is actually the SAFEST way to go here: we will benefit offensively from somehow "breaking the press" against the run ANYWAY, and if I'm wrong about their offensive game-plan we adjust without too much penalty at halftime of a close game. If I'm right, we avert disaster, either ready for them and able to limit the damage, and/or find ourselves in a bit of a back-and-forth track-meet that we're more ready to compete in than we would have been if we assumed too much and found ourselves overwhelmed and knocked back on our heels from the start.
(Agree? Disagree? Some other "concern" entirely? Let's get it into it NOW, I figure--by Thursday night I'll be in gut-check, "I don't wanna THINK about it"/"Let's just GET to it"-mode...)