...more of the SAME come Tuesday.
Here are the regulars on ESPN's "College Football Now" all with their prepared "takes"--and I SWEAR: Everyone ONE of them strike me as sort of ridiculous..."MY 'take away' from Week 1 is how DEEP the Big 12 is!" said one.
Are you KIDDING us, guy?!!
The only possible reason you would SAY that is to somehow bolster y'all HAVING to cover so many essentially MEANINGLESS (long since scheduled, BEFORE all these inevitable changes started cascading down upon College Football) games on your networks in the season(s) ahead.
Subsequent such featured "take aways" from the others were no less irrelevant.
And the WORST is when one or another embarks on a confusing trail of obscure stats and metrics ultimately rationalizing some dubious proposition. Circular logic seems the order of the day.
Have these folks never heard of the "K.I.S.S. Principle"? "KEEP IT SIMPLE, STUPID!", right?
You watch the games, you can SEE if one is the better team--bigger, faster, better coached... and should win the game. Or sometimes they BOTH stink--especially early in the season. But no matter what, once they start playing the games, it is the EYETEST that SHOULD be given top place in any analysis pregame.
But not these guys. Somehow, UK's bumbling, inept performance against a hugely inferior in terms of talent Miami-of-Ohio team, now facing a young and still somewhat stumblingly finding themselves Florida Gator team with clearly a wide range of superior talent that just SWAMPED a really good, Top Ten Utah team, somehow adds up to "Kentucky matches up better against Florida than the Utes did..." in the Swamp, according to one of the people who will be announcing this week's game.
I DON'T recall him (or anyone ELSE) saying anything LIKE that in the weeks leading up to the opening weeks. But THAT'S his "take away" from all we've seen so far? I don't know if that's just another effort to spice up the pre-game controversy; I DO think we continue to see extensive evidence of how Billy Napier, among his many skills is more talented and aware of how to recognize and prepare a team's mindset going INTO a particular contest than Dan Mullen was.
We eliminate a good portion of the errors (not just ours either--how about a better game by the REFEREES???) and slippery hands on the part of our RBs and I THINK we'll return to our old ways, the habit(s) of beating UK AND "always-winning-in-the-SWAMP".
My point: NOTHING is gonna be GIVEN to us, but even BEFORE Billy & Co. get a week to raise-the-level-of-play for Game 2, what I saw of BOTH teams in their openers tells me that we are the better team going IN. Now it's up to US to PROVE it. For the first time in YEARS, there is a vibe, a FEELING SURROUNDING this program that actually gives me a certain calm, a growing SOMETHING: What IS this half-remembered state-of-being? Is it, could it BE...CONFIDENCE?
Maybe not quite, not YET.
Let's see what happens THIS week.
Then we'll talk.