(I ask you all to review our end-of-game and post-game comments on "Game Day" Gators at Vols--so we're all "caught up" again on where we're going here, what was already starting to coalesce around what we saw just at Newyland with US, and what "It ALL" refers to...)
(If you REALLY want a "flash back to reality", skim over the whole Game Day Thread, like I just did...Just a quick run-over, just looking for the "flow" and "flash points", gives a pretty good return as to what's really going on, what's important in OUR world, with our team)
Now: Let me just throw a FEW of that and more out there. Forgive me if I'm "all over the place"--but I'm just starting something I KNOW will go a lot MORE places, at least OUGHT to.
Hey, Dan Mullen-boosters and also (especially) E-, who wonders who we'd be able to get "out there" now OR at the end of this season: Do you think we could (or in e-'s case) COUDN'T get Mullen, if we wanted him, never mind the "good times"-vibe and celebration that team, program, university, town and that whole portion of the state of Mississippi (the non-Rebel part) is surrounding him in, bearing him upon their joyous shoulders? How much more money are WE willing to offer him if we wanted him--and could he refuse it, if we did? There's always, "for the good of my family" after all, and he does have roots in Gainesville. Just asking.
Does Muschamp NOT sit Driskel, play Harris? Is he that far gone, has lost sight of the only way he MIGHT stay, can't SEE how badly this offense is, how it changed its whole character and bearing with the true-freshman in there, is just that ignorant of offense AND stubborn about his decisions that he is doomed all around, for that alone?
Can we beat ANYONE of these SEC teams that are ranked?? Even LSU, probably (even more than USC) the most over-rated, uneven and inconsistent team among the preseason favorites?
Of Auburn and the two Mississippi teams, which of these is the "real deal"? ('Cause I don't think there's more than one among 'em, personally, this season.)
Back to us, how many more games do y'all think we'll win with Driskel in there? How about with Treon? (This last isn't fair, really: I just wanna see the kid IN there, learning--but if he doesn't win, and win fast, or at least get a WHOLE lot more done with this offense than JD, which incidentally SHOULDN'T be that hard, isn't that high a standard by which to judge ANYONE, then Muschamp'll switch back to Driskel in a heartbeat--if he even goes to Harris to start NOW).
So maybe this is the question: Is there ANY realistic scenario where Muschamp gets to stay, and does Muschamp still "do what's best for the Gators" regardless, because he's the honorable-if-fiery and driven-to-success guy I thought he was all along? Am I wrong to now think he's just thinking in the most narrow terms, what gives HIM a chance to keep his job, and "playing not to lose" has become his focus as a result...a self-fulfilling process if there ever WAS one, by-the-way. The whole team seems to play panic-stricken, play-form-fear, especacially on defense much of the time. We have such great talent on that side of the line, and individuals make great plays, kinds of things that save us against inferior teams we've done everything but hand the game to--but can't surmount the overall confusion, lack of proper preparation leading up to or adjustment in-game. Can that change, simply with a situational change--ie. a more efficient AND explosive offense, taking control early and "getting separation" on the scoreboard, forcing the flow and tempo of the game--and can Muschamp learn to KEEP the pressure on, HAS he learned, if ever given the opportunity, NOT to just try and SIT on a two score lead, if he got one?
Y'all know what I think--and where it leads if the answer is "No" to any of the above, let alone most or all.
But what do YOU say--especially if Treon gets in there and performs.
Is any of this a fair place to send young Treon Harris into anyway, especially with so much hope attached to his efforts in what will have to be one hellacious learning curve AND pressure-cooked fishbowl (and THERE'S a vivid image, the water boiling away in a fishbowl, "Goldie" getting poached before our eyes...).
Maybe OK if Muschamp DOESN'T go to him, or tries to just "phase him in, goes half-assed cautious and has Roper just bring him in "for certain series"...NOT likely to work, it's gotta be an "all or nothing" roll of the dice here, but perhaps better for Harris, gives him time and exposure at this level with almost NONE of the potential blame...I'm not so sure it wouldn't have been a good way to go had we not been so woeful with Driskel, had DRISKEL not been so woeful.
I have my own thoughts on all of this, and a lot more topics for consideration, but for a change I'm gonna hold my peace here for now.
Just "throwing 'em out there"...Hope y'all have MORE such questions and comments, answers, whatever.
What DOES it all mean?
(If you REALLY want a "flash back to reality", skim over the whole Game Day Thread, like I just did...Just a quick run-over, just looking for the "flow" and "flash points", gives a pretty good return as to what's really going on, what's important in OUR world, with our team)
Now: Let me just throw a FEW of that and more out there. Forgive me if I'm "all over the place"--but I'm just starting something I KNOW will go a lot MORE places, at least OUGHT to.
Hey, Dan Mullen-boosters and also (especially) E-, who wonders who we'd be able to get "out there" now OR at the end of this season: Do you think we could (or in e-'s case) COUDN'T get Mullen, if we wanted him, never mind the "good times"-vibe and celebration that team, program, university, town and that whole portion of the state of Mississippi (the non-Rebel part) is surrounding him in, bearing him upon their joyous shoulders? How much more money are WE willing to offer him if we wanted him--and could he refuse it, if we did? There's always, "for the good of my family" after all, and he does have roots in Gainesville. Just asking.
Does Muschamp NOT sit Driskel, play Harris? Is he that far gone, has lost sight of the only way he MIGHT stay, can't SEE how badly this offense is, how it changed its whole character and bearing with the true-freshman in there, is just that ignorant of offense AND stubborn about his decisions that he is doomed all around, for that alone?
Can we beat ANYONE of these SEC teams that are ranked?? Even LSU, probably (even more than USC) the most over-rated, uneven and inconsistent team among the preseason favorites?
Of Auburn and the two Mississippi teams, which of these is the "real deal"? ('Cause I don't think there's more than one among 'em, personally, this season.)
Back to us, how many more games do y'all think we'll win with Driskel in there? How about with Treon? (This last isn't fair, really: I just wanna see the kid IN there, learning--but if he doesn't win, and win fast, or at least get a WHOLE lot more done with this offense than JD, which incidentally SHOULDN'T be that hard, isn't that high a standard by which to judge ANYONE, then Muschamp'll switch back to Driskel in a heartbeat--if he even goes to Harris to start NOW).
So maybe this is the question: Is there ANY realistic scenario where Muschamp gets to stay, and does Muschamp still "do what's best for the Gators" regardless, because he's the honorable-if-fiery and driven-to-success guy I thought he was all along? Am I wrong to now think he's just thinking in the most narrow terms, what gives HIM a chance to keep his job, and "playing not to lose" has become his focus as a result...a self-fulfilling process if there ever WAS one, by-the-way. The whole team seems to play panic-stricken, play-form-fear, especacially on defense much of the time. We have such great talent on that side of the line, and individuals make great plays, kinds of things that save us against inferior teams we've done everything but hand the game to--but can't surmount the overall confusion, lack of proper preparation leading up to or adjustment in-game. Can that change, simply with a situational change--ie. a more efficient AND explosive offense, taking control early and "getting separation" on the scoreboard, forcing the flow and tempo of the game--and can Muschamp learn to KEEP the pressure on, HAS he learned, if ever given the opportunity, NOT to just try and SIT on a two score lead, if he got one?
Y'all know what I think--and where it leads if the answer is "No" to any of the above, let alone most or all.
But what do YOU say--especially if Treon gets in there and performs.
Is any of this a fair place to send young Treon Harris into anyway, especially with so much hope attached to his efforts in what will have to be one hellacious learning curve AND pressure-cooked fishbowl (and THERE'S a vivid image, the water boiling away in a fishbowl, "Goldie" getting poached before our eyes...).
Maybe OK if Muschamp DOESN'T go to him, or tries to just "phase him in, goes half-assed cautious and has Roper just bring him in "for certain series"...NOT likely to work, it's gotta be an "all or nothing" roll of the dice here, but perhaps better for Harris, gives him time and exposure at this level with almost NONE of the potential blame...I'm not so sure it wouldn't have been a good way to go had we not been so woeful with Driskel, had DRISKEL not been so woeful.
I have my own thoughts on all of this, and a lot more topics for consideration, but for a change I'm gonna hold my peace here for now.
Just "throwing 'em out there"...Hope y'all have MORE such questions and comments, answers, whatever.
What DOES it all mean?