I am cautiously optimistic about the offense. We screwed the defense when we went from the run-first Plan to Win to the Chinese Fire Drill. If you don't know what I mean about the Chinese Fire Drill, imagine three cars full of teenagers going from The Oaks Mall to Ben Hill Griffin Stadium and at every stoplight or stop sign on Newberry everyone jumps out of the car and runs into a different car before the light changes or within 30 seconds at a stop sign, sometimes even swapping out drivers. Sometimes all five people in one car and six in the other will jump into the '68 Beetle, sometimes nobody will jump into the '76 Duster, or nobody will get in the driver's seat of the '81 El Camino. In other words, utter chaos that leads no leaders, total confusion, and lots of illegal shifts. Well, the defense was built for speed and was not on the field for more than 30 minutes. We screwed the defense by switching mid-stream from "ball-control" (using the term loosely) to Chinese Fire Drill, but by being on the field for more than 30 minutes we saw who the future stars were. Powell, Floyd, and Easley showed more endurance and conditioning than many veterans. Will Hill and Jeremy Brown just plain quit on defense after a while.
I'm not too worried about defense. Teryl Austin and Chuck Heater are doing well. Our young players are fast, but I worry about the defensive linemen not eating quarterbacks and the linebackers not hitting hard. Powell is doing well in both categories. Jelani Jenkins might come back--he gets the E94 stamp of approval. Will Hill had one or two good games, but he needed to have eight or nine more good ones.
Assuming we dump the Chinese Fire Drill offense, our defense should be okay next year.
"Chinese Fire Drill".
Yes, that's a PERFECT description of our whole team's play.
It is certainly what the 3-H-M quickly became. By last Sat. at Doak, it was confusing OUR team more than theirs.
It was there on defense as well, but not so much early:
I thought they lost focus as they once again spent more and more time on the field, the offense repeatedly turning it over without scoring. I think you covered the main points in terms of on-field personnel, what forces were at work there AND why there is cause for hope in the future.
For me, regarding the defense, the only thing standing in the way of outright optimism is whether or not that huge burden in time-of-possession (curtesy of the offense) is the main reason for their disappointing performance as the season wore on. As the freshmen were incorporated into the starting unit, the talent-level clearly improved, but over-all performance did not.
We need some defensive linemen, obviously, and more time and experience for this already young "D" to gel and learn to work together, act instinctively. But I'm still unsure if these coaches are up to the task that is on their shoulders: THEY must implement the system, get the right guys out there in the right positions and sets, bring them together and somehow inject that fire, that "angry edge" that's been missing.
Do we have the right people to pull it off? I'm not saying we don't, only that we saw little sign of it this season. Our defense lacked identity every bit as much as our offense. Yes, we may have already covered most of the reasons...but maybe we haven't either. No matter what, we need our Defensive Coordinator to step up, step forward and "take the bull by the balls!". He doesn't have to do this publicly--with closed practices, we might hardly hear about it except third hand (we've got Zooker for those situations)--that doesn't matter. We will see the results on the field, and that'll be just fine. More than fine.