G8RB8R
VIP Member
It seems like the "No-Heisman for Cam" talk is gaining momentum among those who are allowed to vote. Every day, I hear more and more sports people saying that, in good conscience, they will not/cannot vote for Cam because of integrity issues.
I think these are prety much the same issues as to why Emmitt did not win the Heisman. UF was on probation for cheating, so how can you give the award to a player from that school? Nevermind that Emmitt was clean, his institution was dirty. I believe that the same will end up being true in Cam's case, too, except he has "dirt" on him, too.
So, here's the dilemma that I see for the Heisman Committee...should he even be invited to the ceremonies? If he is invited, isn't that just the same as saying he is worthy of the award? And if that is true, how can he not be awarded the trophy?
To invite the greatest football player this year and NOT award him the trophy, isn't that like some sort of double standard of discrimination?
Why would you even invite the guy, if there is no intention of giving him the award?
I think these are prety much the same issues as to why Emmitt did not win the Heisman. UF was on probation for cheating, so how can you give the award to a player from that school? Nevermind that Emmitt was clean, his institution was dirty. I believe that the same will end up being true in Cam's case, too, except he has "dirt" on him, too.
So, here's the dilemma that I see for the Heisman Committee...should he even be invited to the ceremonies? If he is invited, isn't that just the same as saying he is worthy of the award? And if that is true, how can he not be awarded the trophy?
To invite the greatest football player this year and NOT award him the trophy, isn't that like some sort of double standard of discrimination?
Why would you even invite the guy, if there is no intention of giving him the award?