Discuss. Do you believe the history revisionists who think Cam Newton's departure hurt the Florida Gators in 2010? Personally, I am tired of hearing it. Cam stated it himself in this article and at times when questioned about his time in Gainesville, that he was way too immature back then. This leads me to believe that he needed to leave in order to blossom into what he has become.
From the Tampa Bay Times:
I do not buy this statement. Newton struggled with our offense and could not beat out John Brantley IV in head-to-head competition. Cam was put in to run Tim Tebow plays--QB draws and quick dumps. He completed 5/10 passes for 40 yards in '07 and 1/2 for 14 in '08. In '08, JB4 was 18/28 for 235 with 3 TD and 1 INT. There was no information in 2009 to indicate that Newton was going to supplant JB4 as the successor to Tim Tebow. None. Not with a better offensive coordinator, not with better receivers, and not in any competition against JB4.
This statement gets me. I am certain that our decline in Gainesville had something to do with 11 of our best players now starting in the NFL and piss-poor management of talent and bad execution on offense, and pedestrian play calling on offense.
That being said, if Cam Newton had stayed in Gainesville, I still think JB4 would have been named the starter. Camburglar would have played the role of Tebow to JB4's portrayal of Leak, and Burton & Reed would be playing tight end. In this scheme, Burton probably would be on the bench most of the year.
Let us pretend that Camburglar had beat out JB4 for the starting role or that JB4 got yanked--I still think he does no better than Burton or Reed. In other words, Cam needed to leave G'ville in order to gain the work ethic and desire (and $180K bonus) that it takes to win a Heisman, the highest single-season QB passer rating, and possibly a national championship.
Cam Newton will leave college football as one of the highest paid, and greatest college players in history. I challenge him to come back to repeat his performance in 2011, for free, and see if he deserves to be called the greatest of all time.
Just to drive the point home, since Cam will likely go to the NFL to get paid a little more than this year...
Tebow averages 66.4% completions across his three years as a starter to Newton's 63.9%. The magical milestone for QBs is 2/3 passing completion, which Timmy has. I would be called a Tebow homer if I said that Newton does not have it, but the numbers do not lie--and I am helping out Newton by neglecting his stats at Florida which were 50% completions both years.
Tebow averages 27.67 TDs and 8.63% TD passes per year to Newton's 25 TDs and 8.96%. Tebow gets a slight advantage in number of TDs, but Newton gets a slight advantage in percent of TDs. Spin that any way you want.
Tebow averages 5 INTs per year at 1.55% INTs per attempt to Newton's 5.5 INTs and 2% INTs per attempt. There is no spin on this one. It is the QB's job to pass the ball to the guys with the same color jersey, and Newton can be expected to toss up 2% INTs or more if he returned next year.
Tebow averages 169.67 passer rating to Newton's 169.17. Fairly even, don't you think? One would assume that Newton could almost repeat a passer rating over 180 next year and finish off Timmy in the average passer rating statistic, but we will never know.
Newton is clearly the better runner averaging almost 6 YPA and 11.5% rushing TDs to Tebow's 4 YPA and 8.1% rushing TDs.
The numbers skew to Tebow's favor if I were to only compare two years of Tebow to two years of Newton, but I wanted to tip the numbers in Newton's favor to avoid the "Tebow homer" accusations. Cam Newton is clearly a better runner, but Tim Tebow is clearly a more efficient passer. Newton will get the nod over Tebow because nobody else is looking at Newton's low passer rating at Florida (83.6 and 108.8 for an average between Florida and Auburn of 126.92 or 132.73 if you throw in Blinn College). We will never know if Newton would duplicate his 2010 campaign or prove 2010 to be an anomaly in passer rating. Newton will also get the nod in winning percentage.
If Cam Newton had played for Florida in 2010, do not believe the revisionist history buffs who say that we would have been playing Oregon for the national championship. Statistically, Newton is about even with Tebow, and Tebow could not single-handedly bring the 2007 or 2009 teams to a national championship--it takes a team to do that, not one player.
Both players elevated the play of the team, and the 2010 Auburn War Eagle Tigers are in the NC because they are a better team, not because of one player. That one player makes a difference, but that one player would have only had a minimal effect on the 2010 Florida Gators.
From the Tampa Bay Times:
One player. One decision. And the future of a sport is rewritten.
That's how good Cam Newton was this season. That's how badly Florida could have used him.
I do not buy this statement. Newton struggled with our offense and could not beat out John Brantley IV in head-to-head competition. Cam was put in to run Tim Tebow plays--QB draws and quick dumps. He completed 5/10 passes for 40 yards in '07 and 1/2 for 14 in '08. In '08, JB4 was 18/28 for 235 with 3 TD and 1 INT. There was no information in 2009 to indicate that Newton was going to supplant JB4 as the successor to Tim Tebow. None. Not with a better offensive coordinator, not with better receivers, and not in any competition against JB4.
He left Gainesville, which might be the single greatest reason the Gators had their worst showing in the Southeastern Conference in more than 20 years. He landed in the SEC West, which helped lead to the dethroning of defending national champion Alabama.
And he will be starting at quarterback for Auburn against Oregon on Monday night in a game that could bring the Tigers their first national championship in more than a half-century.
This statement gets me. I am certain that our decline in Gainesville had something to do with 11 of our best players now starting in the NFL and piss-poor management of talent and bad execution on offense, and pedestrian play calling on offense.
That being said, if Cam Newton had stayed in Gainesville, I still think JB4 would have been named the starter. Camburglar would have played the role of Tebow to JB4's portrayal of Leak, and Burton & Reed would be playing tight end. In this scheme, Burton probably would be on the bench most of the year.
Let us pretend that Camburglar had beat out JB4 for the starting role or that JB4 got yanked--I still think he does no better than Burton or Reed. In other words, Cam needed to leave G'ville in order to gain the work ethic and desire (and $180K bonus) that it takes to win a Heisman, the highest single-season QB passer rating, and possibly a national championship.
Cam Newton will leave college football as one of the highest paid, and greatest college players in history. I challenge him to come back to repeat his performance in 2011, for free, and see if he deserves to be called the greatest of all time.
Just to drive the point home, since Cam will likely go to the NFL to get paid a little more than this year...
Code:
PLAYER NAME COMP ATT YDS COMP%
Tim Tebow '07 234 350 3286 66.9%
Tim Tebow '08 192 298 2746 64.4%
Tim Tebow '09 213 314 2895 67.8%
Cam Newton '09 204 336 2833 60.7%
Cam Newton '10 165 246 2589 67.1%
Tebow averages 66.4% completions across his three years as a starter to Newton's 63.9%. The magical milestone for QBs is 2/3 passing completion, which Timmy has. I would be called a Tebow homer if I said that Newton does not have it, but the numbers do not lie--and I am helping out Newton by neglecting his stats at Florida which were 50% completions both years.
Code:
TD TD%
Tim Tebow '07 32 9.1%
Tim Tebow '08 30 10.1%
Tim Tebow '09 21 6.7%
Cam Newton '09 22 6.5%
Cam Newton '10 28 11.4%
Tebow averages 27.67 TDs and 8.63% TD passes per year to Newton's 25 TDs and 8.96%. Tebow gets a slight advantage in number of TDs, but Newton gets a slight advantage in percent of TDs. Spin that any way you want.
Code:
INT INT%
Tim Tebow '07 6 1.71%
Tim Tebow '08 4 1.34%
Tim Tebow '09 5 1.59%
Cam Newton '09 5 1.49%
Cam Newton '10 6 2.44%
Tebow averages 5 INTs per year at 1.55% INTs per attempt to Newton's 5.5 INTs and 2% INTs per attempt. There is no spin on this one. It is the QB's job to pass the ball to the guys with the same color jersey, and Newton can be expected to toss up 2% INTs or more if he returned next year.
Code:
RAT
Tim Tebow '07 172.47
Tim Tebow '08 172.37
Tim Tebow '09 164.17
Cam Newton '09 150.17
Cam Newton '10 188.16
Tebow averages 169.67 passer rating to Newton's 169.17. Fairly even, don't you think? One would assume that Newton could almost repeat a passer rating over 180 next year and finish off Timmy in the average passer rating statistic, but we will never know.
Code:
RUSH YPA RUSH TD%
Tim Tebow '07 4.26 11.0%
Tim Tebow '08 3.82 6.8%
Tim Tebow '09 4.19 6.5%
Cam Newton '09 6.06 14.8%
Cam Newton '10 5.82 8.3%
Newton is clearly the better runner averaging almost 6 YPA and 11.5% rushing TDs to Tebow's 4 YPA and 8.1% rushing TDs.
The numbers skew to Tebow's favor if I were to only compare two years of Tebow to two years of Newton, but I wanted to tip the numbers in Newton's favor to avoid the "Tebow homer" accusations. Cam Newton is clearly a better runner, but Tim Tebow is clearly a more efficient passer. Newton will get the nod over Tebow because nobody else is looking at Newton's low passer rating at Florida (83.6 and 108.8 for an average between Florida and Auburn of 126.92 or 132.73 if you throw in Blinn College). We will never know if Newton would duplicate his 2010 campaign or prove 2010 to be an anomaly in passer rating. Newton will also get the nod in winning percentage.
If Cam Newton had played for Florida in 2010, do not believe the revisionist history buffs who say that we would have been playing Oregon for the national championship. Statistically, Newton is about even with Tebow, and Tebow could not single-handedly bring the 2007 or 2009 teams to a national championship--it takes a team to do that, not one player.
Both players elevated the play of the team, and the 2010 Auburn War Eagle Tigers are in the NC because they are a better team, not because of one player. That one player makes a difference, but that one player would have only had a minimal effect on the 2010 Florida Gators.