Thing is, this all DOES continue to raise more and more questions--it can't HELP but spiral out of control...
So many things come to mind, many of them among the side-stories that are already being raised by others. This whole business with his father. I mean, Cam has HIS "plausible deniability" like everyone else here (right up to Gene Chizic and the Auburn AD, I imagine--you watch, if and when the actual money transfer is documented, it'll be laid on some "out-of-control booster"), in his case his dad, the "respected local religious figure". Sure, "it was all up to my dad", but now there are his own words reflecting Cam's implicit knowledge of money on the table. All in all, it appears "the apple didn't fall far from the tree". From what we know so far, the father's a hypocrite, and the son has no values whatsoever; think there may be a connection?
Yeah, this one's turning into a real daily melodrama. I'm now getting comfortable with just ignoring Auburn and its apologists' desperate efforts to deflect the the growing tide of bad news and just sitting back and waiting for the next inevitable shoe to drop.
Meanwhile, for whatever reasons (and those alone are fascinating to consider) Auburn's "braintrust" has decided to go "all in", "betting the house" I suppose that "they" (either the NCAA OR various legal entities) won't be able to PROVE any of the most damning charges. Actually, it's the entry of those "legal entities" to the fray that makes escape from ultimate culpability much less likely; the Auburn folks may not have expected that, not this quickly, anyway. From their point-of-view the "worst case scenario" probably is that an NCAA investigation takes so damn long: they probably figured that even if it turns out badly, like USC they'll have long since had a Heisman winner and a run at a National Championship--and if the worst charges are true, they would have gotten creamed by the NCAA in ANY event, so why not?
I guess I can't really fault this reasoning, from a practical standpoint, IF they didn't know about it all until it was already long since a "done deal", as they no doubt will claim. However, I just don't believe that that can be anything more than another version of that "plausible deniability" referred to above, in which case you really gotta ask yourself, "Was it worth the 5-to-7 years in football-program-purgatory the NCAA sanctions will put you in?" (maybe worse: they're not USC, after all).