I just don't see it that way. Sorry--to me, it has seemed that Driskel, like the whole offense, had its good and its bad days over the course of the past season, his first as starter. I won't make excuses EITHER, and I TOO expect improvement and especially consistency in 2013: I'll be ready and willing to make that kind of harsh assessment if we do NOT see the kind of wholesale improvement expected in Driskel specifically, and the offense in general next season, right from the start--but I refuse to freak out at this point. The same things I saw and liked about him are still there, I figure--and in the same way that most of us have learned to trust the staff in their judgment in other areas concerning personnel choices, I think it is wise and only fair to trust them in this one, possibly the most important area-of-choice of all.
Anyway, I'm sorry you feel SO strongly about it that you seem to take my reasoning so personally, E- (and just so you know, I honestly DIDN'T have you, of all people, in mind when making the point that included the word "backlash"), and am doing my best NOT to take it too much to heart right now--otherwise I might get the idea that all this is about more than just the one issue, which I gotta admit, I just don't really understand to begin with.
[...And btw: JD's 1st pass of the game was popped up in the air on (a) what should have been an easy catch (now THAT pissed me off!), and (b) what should have been "scripted" either as a running play or a "Long Bomb" in-the-FIRST-place--a perfect Volleyball set-up for the Pick-Six that you yourself insisted--and I agree, as a 1st-hand witness--would have changed the whole nature and flow of the game, and very possibly its entire outcome (I STILL say "We lost THIS game on the coin-toss!")...Tell me: Can you honestly say you yourself might not feel differently now had that been the case, and we had WON the game, going away, as expected (ESPECIALLY if it had been a beautiful "rainbow-TD-pass" to open things up)?...And if there is even the SLIGHTEST SLIVER of a possibility that that is so, how does that reflect on the hard and sharp anger you appear to still feel now? I mean, no matter what, Driskel's not a bad kid, he has talent, and he's giving all he's got--so whether he's "it" or NOT, what IS with the hostility? I'll be disappointed TOO if we have to take a step back, open up competition to find a new starter mid-season, and somehow recover while our defense meanwhile hopefully carries us again (on offense another "Brantley-like situation" after all)--and maybe even angry, if it's part of a general series of misjudgments that have us essentially missing-an-opportunity, MISSING-ANOTHER-YEAR, in the final analysis--but I HOPE I won't hate Driskel, blame him alone...as with any such breakdown, there'd be plenty of "blame" to go around. Frankly, NONE of this changes my basic point that for good or ill, at the moment, choices, timing and resulting situational details have determined that we ARE NOW COUNTING ON JD--That is, it would be our "best-case scenario" if he WERE to come through and succeed as the starting QB in a revamped-offense...but he will ALSO in turn be depending on new runners, receivers and a rebuilt O-line to help ensure that success. Either that, or he'll have to ignore everything, just run around and fling it out there in spite of everything else screwing up around him, if that's what is happening, and we just don't have evidence that he could take his very real skills and DO that, game-in/game-out. Let us DEARLY hope, then, that doesn't turn out to be required! Can we agree on at THAT much, at least?]