Two points E-94, 1. Probably not much of a surprise since the top programs especially when their winning turn the other way when it comes their players studies unless they have to (just ask Cash Money Newton). Since Spurrier in SCar now I wouldn't be surprise that's what's happening there now. 2. Muschamp IS BETTER THAN ZOOK. Did Zook go to a BCS as a Gator coach? Did he finished 11-1 (EVER)? NO AND HECK NO. Don't know who to blame for the 2009 SEC title and 2010 season. I blame that coach more so for the 2010 season than the SEC 2009 title game, coaches can only do so much in a game but during a season well that's a different story.
Meant to answer you here, Lf: NOT so much because it matters anymore who to blame and/or why it is necessary, but the fact remains, only NOW are we finally in-the-process of shedding the last of the REASONS for why those events and bad seasons back there HAPPENED: the players THEMSELVES, mainly--PICKED BY MEYER, inherited by Muschamp with all of their disappointing missing-talent, motivation, self-discipline or WHATEVER...The ones who made it through CHOMP's filter of "hard-work and no bullsh*t" gave AND got something worthwhile after all here at UF. So: Plenty of "blame" to go around, but a large dollop in the hands (and hearts) of the players themselves, perhaps, yes--but the big DOUBLE SCOOP goes to our "
former
coach", not Zook but the much-celebrated, even-now-highly-media-approved Meyer. I believe that even accepting E-'s premise that it's too early in his regime to judge Muschamp's relative success in team-building (though the signs ARE real encouraging), we CAN do a valid "before/after" comparison, that here he CLEARLY wins out, and that this is BECAUSE of Meyer's obvious string of failures, for whatever reason, there at the end.
Yes, for what it is worth, to so many implied questions, "It WAS Meyer's fault."