For all the reasons noted above, I agree--with certain caveats regarding (as E- too notes) Strong being a talented and "Classy" coach: If he's on the sidelines that day, we'll have to actually show up and BEAT them. This WILL be their players' "National Championship", if not ours--which can lead to an edge for them and early, laid-back fatigue for us if we don't at LEAST come in ready to STRAP ON OUR HELMETS and PLAY TO WIN!Congrats to Coach Strong and company but he's still going to get his @$$ kick hard. Remember the last time the Gators face off against the Big East champs in the Sugar Bowl?
One more (related) warning: We haven't been showing up for whole portions (especially the first half and MORE) of games we are heavily favored in this season...Prepare and show up with pride, and we will play well and win, but revert to most of our post-SEC schedule "auto-pilot" and we'll find ourselves in a fight that we may not be able to "flip the switch" on in time, this time...
(Meanwhile, there's ANOTHER Q ENTIRELY raised here:
Which job do you think Charley is likeliest to take? Which job, if any, SHOULD he take, in your view?
They ALL have positives and negatives, some they share with each OTHER: The most basic, of course=the more--MUCH more--they pay, the more that is expected...and the less time a prospective Head Coach will likely have to get things turned around before the restlessness and dissatisfaction begin to build.
This question of "Who goes where?", like the similar one posed in The Great Conference Consolidation and Elimination Process, is another of the fun "games" my "friends and drinking buds" engage in...For eg., we had Louisville leaving the Miniscule East to fill one of the spots left vacant in the ACC (so-far, the "Clear-the-Throat" Conference is my working joke-title for them) when THEY lost two over to the Big & Slow Ten--we had that one WEEKS ago, but figured it'd be Syracuse going with them, instead of...well, you get the idea here.
Returning to the Coaching Division of the "Who goes where"-game, then, think about these jobs, three BIG ones, two of them SEC, and consider who might be "in it" and "which one where?"...I'd be particularly interested in Escambia94, 's stats, logic and thoroughness-of-thought being brought to bare on this--particularly as regards to where Strong may (or may NOT?) be going, though a wider overview of other/all candidates--and even moving over to consideration of the parallel "game" too--would ALL be welcome, imo.)