Denver Broncos fans: do you miss Tim Tebow yet? At least Timmy got you one game further. At least Manning's throwing mechanics were perfect in those 2 INTs.
Glad someone made this point here...I've been raising this exact issue all over the web--especially in various places over at ESPN, along lines of:
"So, Little Johnie and the Bronco Brown-Nosers take note: 'The Acceptable Over-the-Hill Legend' takes a healthier, better-stocked version of your team to the 1st-game-of-the-play-offs and personally BLOWS it late, whereas 'that useless, unskilled kid' puts your then-weaker, winless team on his back with little support, gets you there anyway and WINS it on a stunning, dazzling play in overtime...Gee, maybe 'having heart' and 'being a winner' have value after all."
I do NOT expect the sportswriters or media pundits to "get" this at all, though...In addition to being thick-headed, me-too morons, there is so much lazy thinking and easy "goin' along to get along" happening in that "profession"--I mean, where else are these untalented hacks going to make the money they DO if brains, talent and insight they don't have and never will were required--that any such change would ALSO mean a change in the folks making the personnel decisions, AND the people writing/talking about it.
I am reminded of one of the more frustrating side notes to the movie (and real life story BEHIND) "Moneyball", wherein the story was clearly and TOTALLY that of Oakland GM Billy Beane's embracing a radically revolutionary approach to stocking his team with statistical run-production in mind, and making it WORK--against all odds, adversity, resistance and even abuse, including even a Field Mgr. who did everything possible to sabotage his efforts because HE didn't believe in them and was only concerned with how HE would look, and whom Billy didn't have the power to fire...So he makes moves that leave that manager with no CHOICE but to play the guys Billy wants him to: The mgr. goes into a sulk and just stands around with his arms folded for the middle 2/3 of the season, while "the new way" kicks in, begins to work and gets them to the top of their division--BUT the MEDIA guys cover it all as "The savvy, old-time mgr.'s calming influence making the difference...etc etc", missing the point entirely and totally crediting the WRONG GUY. After an amazing season that includes this team of cast-offs with a payroll 1/3 that of the Yankees equaling their win-total and in-the-process beating that team's--the 1927, "Murderer's Row"-version--in-season streak of 20 wins-in-a-row, but losing the deciding game of the LCS and not making it to the Series, those same writers and pundits suddenly focus on that "system" they did their best to ignore all season, now BLAMING it for "not being able to build a team by numbers and statistics that can win championships"...and the thing is, similar to the whole Tebow story I think (and maybe explaining some of the DEPTH of feeling against #15), is again here this threat to both the writer/talkers' easy answers, their lazy, well-paid jobs (doing stuff that sounds like FUN, btw--going to big-league games in every sport, prowling around locker rooms and camps etc., and then bitching about it all and getting PAID for it--which I'd never begrudge ANYONE if they at LEAST had the style, grace and humility to at least TRY doing it honestly and well)...Likewise the generally mediocre minds that fill out all but the best staffs of the best teams and/or programs, all getting by on mediocre teams by parroting whatever party-line "philosophy" is being purveyed by the folks above and around them--ALL of these folks will OF COURSE resent and despise ANYONE whose very existence threatens that easy life--not to mention remind themselves and the public-at-large that they don't know what the f*ck they are talking about in the first place...I guess by my own reasoning, it isn't likely to change much, now is it?